|
I. Introduction
A. Two definitions
of economics growth were given in Chapter 8.
1. The
increase in real GDP, which occurs over a period of time.
2. The
increase in real GDP per capita, which occurs over time. This definition is superior if comparison of
living standards is desired.
B. Growth has been
impressive in capitalist countries during the past half century. Real GDP in the U.S. increased by 450
percent.
C. This chapter
explores economic growth in more depth than Chapter 8.
II. Six Main Ingredients of Growth
A. Four supply
factors relate to the ability to grow.
1. The
quantity and quality of natural resources,
2. The
quantity and quality of human resources,
3. The supply
or stock of capital goods, and
4. Technology.
B. Two demand and
efficiency factors are also related to growth.
1. Aggregate
demand must increase for production to expand.
2. Full
employment of resources and both productive and allocative efficiency are
necessary to get the maximum amount of production possible.
III. Production Possibilities Analysis (Figure
17-1)
A. Growth can be
illustrated with a production possibilities curve (Figure 17-1), where growth
is indicated as an outward shift of the curve from AB to CD.
1. Aggregate
demand must increase to sustain full employment at each new level of production
possible.
2. Additional
resources that shift the curve outward must be employed efficiently to make the
maximum possible contribution to domestic output.
3. And
for economy to achieve the maximum increase in monetary value, the optimal
combination of goods must be achieved (allocative efficiency).
B. Focus on the
supply side is illustrated in Figure 17-2, where growth depends on labor inputs
multiplied by labor productivity.
1. Increased
labor inputs depend on size of population and labor force participation rate
(the percent of population actually in the labor force).
2. Productivity
is determined by technological progress, the availability of capital goods,
quality of labor itself, and efficiency with which inputs are allocated,
combined, and managed.
C. Aggregate
demand‑aggregate supply framework can also be used to illustrate growth,
as seen in Figure 17-3. Aggregate
supply shifts outward with economic growth, and in recent decades aggregate
demand has shifted outward by an even greater amount. Nominal GDP rises faster than real GDP. (Key Question 3)
D. Extended
AD-AD model is shown in figure 17-4 where short-term and long-term aggregate
supply are differentiated in Figure 17-4.
1. Long-run
potential output is shown at Q1. It depends on resources and productive efficiency.
2. If
potential output increases, the long-run supply curve shifts from ASLR1
to ASLR2.
3. If
aggregate demand rises from AD1 to AD2, real output rises
to Q2 and prices to P2.
4. At
P2 there will be a different short-run AS curve, AS2.
5. The
result is some mild inflation and increases in real GDP.
IV. Growth Record of the United States (Table
17-5)
A. Real GDP has
increased more than sixfold since 1940, and real per capita GDP has risen by a
multiple of three.
B. Rate of growth
record shows that real GDP has grown 3.1 percent per year since 1948 and real
GDP per capita has grown about 2 percent per year. In last four years of century, U.S. economic growth surged and
averaged more than 4 percent per year. But the arithmetic needs to be qualified.
1. Growth
doesn’t measure quality improvements.
2. Growth
doesn’t measure increased leisure time.
3. Growth
doesn’t take into account adverse effects on environment.
4. International
comparisons are useful in evaluating U.S. performance. For example, Japan has grown more than twice
as fast as U.S. since 1948 (see Global Perspective 17-1) but less in past
decade.
V. Accounting for growth is an attempt to
quantify factors contributing to economic growth as shown in Table 17-1. Important research has been done in the area
by Edward Denison.
A. More labor input
is one source of growth. Labor force
has grown about 2 million workers per year for past 25 years and accounts for
about one-third of total economic growth.
B. Technological
advance, the most important factor, has been estimated to contribute to about
26 percent of the U.S. growth record since 1929.
C. Increases in
quantity of capital are estimated to have contributed 18% to economic growth in
U.S. since 1929.
D. Education and
training improve the quality of labor. (See Figure 17-6 and Table 17-1)
E. Improved
resource allocation and economies of scale also contribute to growth and
explain about 12% of total.
1. Improved
resource allocation has occurred as discrimination disappears and labor moves
where it is most productive, and as tariffs and other trade barriers are
lowered.
2. Economies
of scale occur as the size of markets and firms that serve them have grown.
F. Other factors
influence growth and are more difficult to measure.
1. Social
cultural environment and political stability are “growth friendly” in U.S.
a. Respect for
material success provides incentive to increase incomes.
b. Market system
rewards actions that increase output.
c. Property
rights and legal system encourage growth.
2. Positive attitudes toward work and flow of energetic
immigrants also add to growth.
VI. Productivity Growth and the New Economy
(Figure 17-7)
A. Improvement in
standard of living is linked to labor productivity – output per worker per
hour.
B. The
U.S. is experiencing a resurgence of productivity growth based on innovations
in computers and communications, coupled with global capitalism. Since 1995 productivity growth has averaged
2.9% annually – up from 1.4% over 1973-95 period. “Rule of 70” projects real income will double in 23 years rather
than 50 years.
C. Much
recent improvement in productivity is due to “new economy” factors such as:
1. Microchips
and information technology are the basis for improved productivity. Many new inventions are based on microchip
technology.
2. New
firms and increasing returns characterize the new economy.
a. Some
of today’s most successful firms didn’t exist 25 years ago: Dell, Compaq, Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco
Systems, America Online, Yahoo and Amazon.com are just a few of many.
b. Economies
of sale and increasing returns in new firms encourage rapid growth. (See Table 17-1)
3. Sources
of increasing returns include:
a. More
specialized inputs.
b. Ability
to spread development costs over large output quantities since marginal costs
are low.
c. Simultaneous
consumption of many customers at same time.
d. Network
effects make widespread use of information goods more valuable as more use the
products.
e. Learning
increases with practice.
4. Global
competition encourages innovation and efficiency.
D. Macroeconomic
outcomes include increases in aggregate supply (shift to right). See Figure 17-3.
E. Faster
growth without inflation is possible with higher productivity.
F. The
natural rate of unemployment seems to be lower (4.5 – 5.0%).
G. Federal
revenues increase with economic growth; a 1995 deficit of $160 billion became a
$167 billion surplus in 2000.
H. Skepticism
about long-term continued growth remains.
VII. Is Growth Desirable and Sustainable?
A. An antigrowth view
exists.
1. Growth
causes pollution, global warming, ozone depletion, and other problems.
2. “More” is
not always better if it means dead-end jobs, burnout, and alienation from one’s
job.
3. High
growth creates high stress.
B. Others argue in
defense of growth.
1. Growth
leads to improved standard of living.
2. Growth
helps to reduce poverty in poor countries.
3. Growth has
improved working conditions.
4. Growth
allows more leisure and less alienation from work.
6. Environmental
concerns are important, but growth actually has allowed more sensitivity to
environmental concerns and the ability to deal with them.
C. Is
growth sustainable? Yes, say proponents
of growth.
1. Resource prices are not rising.
2. Growth
today has more to do with expansion and application of knowledge and
information, so is limited only by human imagination.
VIII. LAST WORD: Some Pleasant Side Effects of the New
Economy
A. Economists
Jason Saving and W. Michael Cox point to other benefits of New Economy besides
improved living standards.
B. Crime
rates are down possible due to better job and income prospects.
C. Welfare
rolls have fallen from 5.5% of U.S. population in 1995 to 2.5% in 1999.
D. Charitable
contributions increased an average 9% annually, much higher than previous
increases in giving.
Minority well being improved with decreased poverty and
unemployment rates.
|